Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) vs Chocolate bear graham
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack)
Chocolate bear graham
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) and Chocolate bear graham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 31 more calories per 100g than Chocolate bear graham. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate bear graham contains 25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) offers a protein boost with 15.7g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate bear graham in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) or Chocolate bear graham?
It depends on your goals. Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) has 67.1 calories, while Chocolate bear graham has 35.714285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) vegan?
No, Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Light Tuna Flake, Non Oil (skipjack) and Chocolate bear graham?
There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.
