Head-to-Head Analysis

Lightly Salted Almonds vs Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lightly Salted Almonds

Lightly Salted Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai

Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
81.7 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
1.1g
57.1g
Fat
1.6g
21.4g
Protein
8.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lightly Salted Almonds and Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lightly Salted Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 525 more calories per 100g than Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lightly Salted Almonds contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai (1.08g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Lightly Salted Almonds offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lightly Salted Almonds or Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai?

It depends on your goals. Lightly Salted Almonds has 607 calories, while Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai has 81.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lightly Salted Almonds vegan?

No, Lightly Salted Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lightly Salted Almonds and Chicken Lumpia with Shrimp Shanghai?

There is a difference of 525 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.