Head-to-Head Analysis

Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies vs Hamburger Dill Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies

Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hamburger Dill Chips

Hamburger Dill Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
421 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
42.1g
Sugars
0g
15.8g
Fat
0g
2.6g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
2.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies and Hamburger Dill Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 421 more calories per 100g than Hamburger Dill Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies contains significantly more sugar (42.1g) compared to the milder Hamburger Dill Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hamburger Dill Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies offers a protein boost with 2.63g per 100g, outperforming Hamburger Dill Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies or Hamburger Dill Chips?

It depends on your goals. Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies has 421 calories, while Hamburger Dill Chips has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies vegan?

No, Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Limited Edition Frosted Sugar Cookies and Hamburger Dill Chips?

There is a difference of 421 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.