Head-to-Head Analysis

Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate vs triscuit

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate

Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of triscuit

triscuit

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
546 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
45g
Sugars
0g
35g
Fat
0g
6g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate and triscuit side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 546 more calories per 100g than triscuit. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (45g) compared to the milder triscuit (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, triscuit is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 6g per 100g, outperforming triscuit in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate or triscuit?

It depends on your goals. Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate has 546 calories, while triscuit has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lindt Excellence Roasted Hazelnut Dark Chocolate and triscuit?

There is a difference of 546 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.