Head-to-Head Analysis

Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vs Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices

Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
387.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
7.1g
Fat
29g
25g
Protein
22.6g
1.5g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is the clear winner. With 173 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese or Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices?

It depends on your goals. Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 214 calories, while Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices has 387.09677419355 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vegan?

No, Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lite Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Pepper Jack Natural Cheese 26 Cracker Cut Slices?

There is a difference of 173 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.