Head-to-Head Analysis

Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) vs Mixed Vegetables

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade)

Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mixed Vegetables

Mixed Vegetables

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
55.6 kcal
21.9g
Sugars
4.4g
18.8g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
2.2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) and Mixed Vegetables side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 194 more calories per 100g than Mixed Vegetables. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) contains significantly more sugar (21.9g) compared to the milder Mixed Vegetables (4.44g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mixed Vegetables is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) or Mixed Vegetables?

It depends on your goals. Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) has 250 calories, while Mixed Vegetables has 55.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) vegan?

No, Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lite Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette (Dressing & Marinade) and Mixed Vegetables?

There is a difference of 194 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.