Little chicks milk chocolate vs Coconut Rolls banana
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Little chicks milk chocolate
Coconut Rolls banana
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Little chicks milk chocolate and Coconut Rolls banana side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Little chicks milk chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 280 more calories per 100g than Coconut Rolls banana. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Little chicks milk chocolate contains significantly more sugar (50g) compared to the milder Coconut Rolls banana (20g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coconut Rolls banana is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Little chicks milk chocolate offers a protein boost with 6g per 100g, outperforming Coconut Rolls banana in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Little chicks milk chocolate or Coconut Rolls banana?
It depends on your goals. Little chicks milk chocolate has 580 calories, while Coconut Rolls banana has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Little chicks milk chocolate vegan?
No, Little chicks milk chocolate is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Little chicks milk chocolate and Coconut Rolls banana?
There is a difference of 280 calories per 100g between the two products.
