Head-to-Head Analysis

Loaded Potato Skins vs Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Loaded Potato Skins

Loaded Potato Skins

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty

Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
308 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
28.6g
15.4g
Fat
25g
12.1g
Protein
3.6g
1.4g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Loaded Potato Skins and Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Loaded Potato Skins is the clear winner. With 156 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Loaded Potato Skins takes the lead with only 1.1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty contains 28.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Loaded Potato Skins offers a protein boost with 12.1g per 100g, outperforming Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Loaded Potato Skins or Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty?

Loaded Potato Skins appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Loaded Potato Skins vegan?

No, Loaded Potato Skins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Loaded Potato Skins and Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty?

There is a difference of 156 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.