Head-to-Head Analysis

Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink vs Chocolate Lowfat Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink

Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate Lowfat Milk

Chocolate Lowfat Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
9.5 kcal
Energy
91.7 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
14.6g
0g
Fat
1g
0g
Protein
4.6g
0.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink and Chocolate Lowfat Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink is the clear winner. With 82 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink takes the lead with only 1.9027484143763g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate Lowfat Milk contains 14.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink or Chocolate Lowfat Milk?

Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink vegan?

No, Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink and Chocolate Lowfat Milk?

There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.