Head-to-Head Analysis

Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink vs Sparkling water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink

Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sparkling water

Sparkling water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
9.5 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink and Sparkling water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink is the more energy-dense option here, packing 10 more calories per 100g than Sparkling water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink contains significantly more sugar (1.9027484143763g) compared to the milder Sparkling water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sparkling water is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink or Sparkling water?

It depends on your goals. Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink has 9.5137420718816 calories, while Sparkling water has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink vegan?

No, Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low-Calorie Gridlock Energy Drink and Sparkling water?

There is a difference of 10 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.