Head-to-Head Analysis

Low Carb Indulgence pistachio vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low Carb Indulgence pistachio

Low Carb Indulgence pistachio

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
406.3 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
8.8g
Sugars
6g
31.9g
Fat
0g
5g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low Carb Indulgence pistachio and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Low Carb Indulgence pistachio is the more energy-dense option here, packing 146 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Low Carb Indulgence pistachio contains significantly more sugar (8.75g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Low Carb Indulgence pistachio offers a protein boost with 5g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low Carb Indulgence pistachio or Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. Low Carb Indulgence pistachio has 406.25 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low Carb Indulgence pistachio vegan?

No, Low Carb Indulgence pistachio is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low Carb Indulgence pistachio and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 146 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.