Head-to-Head Analysis

Low-Moisture Part-Skim vs Colby jack cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Low-Moisture Part-Skim

Low-Moisture Part-Skim

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Colby jack cheese

Colby jack cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
32.1g
23.8g
Protein
25g
1.8g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low-Moisture Part-Skim and Colby jack cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Low-Moisture Part-Skim is the clear winner. With 60 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low-Moisture Part-Skim or Colby jack cheese?

It depends on your goals. Low-Moisture Part-Skim has 333 calories, while Colby jack cheese has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low-Moisture Part-Skim vegan?

No, Low-Moisture Part-Skim is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low-Moisture Part-Skim and Colby jack cheese?

There is a difference of 60 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.