Head-to-Head Analysis

Low-Moisture Part Skim vs Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Low-Moisture Part Skim

Low-Moisture Part Skim

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat

Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
88.5 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.5g
17.9g
Fat
2.2g
25g
Protein
11.5g
1.9g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low-Moisture Part Skim and Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Low-Moisture Part Skim is the more energy-dense option here, packing 197 more calories per 100g than Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Low-Moisture Part Skim takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat contains 3.54g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Low-Moisture Part Skim offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low-Moisture Part Skim or Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat?

It depends on your goals. Low-Moisture Part Skim has 285.71 calories, while Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat has 88.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low-Moisture Part Skim vegan?

No, Low-Moisture Part Skim is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low-Moisture Part Skim and Lowfat Cottage Cheese Small Curd 2% Milkfat?

There is a difference of 197 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.