Head-to-Head Analysis

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vs Sliced colby jack natural cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced colby jack natural cheese

Sliced colby jack natural cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
368.4 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
31.6g
25g
Protein
26.3g
1.7g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Sliced colby jack natural cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is the clear winner. With 83 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Sliced colby jack natural cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced colby jack natural cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese or Sliced colby jack natural cheese?

It depends on your goals. Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 285.71 calories, while Sliced colby jack natural cheese has 368.42105263158 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vegan?

No, Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Sliced colby jack natural cheese?

There is a difference of 83 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.