Head-to-Head Analysis

Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick vs Evaporated Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick

Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Evaporated Milk

Evaporated Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
304 kcal
Energy
133 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
10g
22.5g
Fat
6.7g
22.5g
Protein
6.7g
1.6g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick and Evaporated Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick is the more energy-dense option here, packing 171 more calories per 100g than Evaporated Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick takes the lead with only 1.07g of sugar per 100g, whereas Evaporated Milk contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick offers a protein boost with 22.5g per 100g, outperforming Evaporated Milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick or Evaporated Milk?

It depends on your goals. Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick has 304 calories, while Evaporated Milk has 133 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick vegan?

No, Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick and Evaporated Milk?

There is a difference of 171 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.