Head-to-Head Analysis

Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick vs Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick

Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese

Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
304 kcal
Energy
368 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
0g
22.5g
Fat
26.3g
22.5g
Protein
26.3g
1.6g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick and Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick is the clear winner. With 64 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick contains significantly more sugar (1.07g) compared to the milder Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick or Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick has 304 calories, while Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese has 368 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick vegan?

No, Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low Moisture Part Skim Mozzarella Cheese Stick and Provolone Deli-Sliced Cheese?

There is a difference of 64 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.