Head-to-Head Analysis

Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds vs Garlic Salt with Parsley

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds

Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Garlic Salt with Parsley

Garlic Salt with Parsley

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2400 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
12.7g
Sugars
3g
204g
Fat
2.6g
76.5g
Protein
2.6g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds and Garlic Salt with Parsley side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 2400 more calories per 100g than Garlic Salt with Parsley. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds contains significantly more sugar (12.7g) compared to the milder Garlic Salt with Parsley (3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Garlic Salt with Parsley is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds offers a protein boost with 76.5g per 100g, outperforming Garlic Salt with Parsley in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds or Garlic Salt with Parsley?

It depends on your goals. Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds has 2400 calories, while Garlic Salt with Parsley has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds vegan?

No, Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds and Garlic Salt with Parsley?

There is a difference of 2400 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.