Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds vs Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds
Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds and Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 2399 more calories per 100g than Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds contains significantly more sugar (12.7g) compared to the milder Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds offers a protein boost with 76.5g per 100g, outperforming Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds or Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water?
It depends on your goals. Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds has 2400 calories, while Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water has 1.04 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds vegan?
No, Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Low Sodium Lightly Salted Almonds and Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water?
There is a difference of 2399 calories per 100g between the two products.
