Head-to-Head Analysis

LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour vs Ritz bits cheese peg bag

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour

LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Ritz bits cheese peg bag

Ritz bits cheese peg bag

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
438 kcal
Energy
516 kcal
5g
Sugars
12.9g
32.2g
Fat
29g
31.2g
Protein
6.5g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour and Ritz bits cheese peg bag side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour is the clear winner. With 78 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour takes the lead with only 5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ritz bits cheese peg bag contains 12.903225806452g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour offers a protein boost with 31.2g per 100g, outperforming Ritz bits cheese peg bag in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour or Ritz bits cheese peg bag?

LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour vegan?

No, LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between LOW Sugar Delight Choc Cherry & Coconut Flavour and Ritz bits cheese peg bag?

There is a difference of 78 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.