Head-to-Head Analysis

Lower Sodium Bacon vs Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Lower Sodium Bacon

Lower Sodium Bacon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon

Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
411.8 kcal
Energy
318.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
9.1g
35.3g
Fat
18.2g
35.3g
Protein
18.2g
3.2g
Salt
6.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lower Sodium Bacon and Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lower Sodium Bacon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 94 more calories per 100g than Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Lower Sodium Bacon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon contains 9.0909090909091g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Lower Sodium Bacon offers a protein boost with 35.2941176470588g per 100g, outperforming Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lower Sodium Bacon or Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon?

It depends on your goals. Lower Sodium Bacon has 411.764705882353 calories, while Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon has 318.18181818182 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lower Sodium Bacon vegan?

No, Lower Sodium Bacon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lower Sodium Bacon and Applewood Smoked Uncured Bacon?

There is a difference of 94 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.