Lowfat yogurt vs Low-Moisture Part-Skim
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Lowfat yogurt
Low-Moisture Part-Skim
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Lowfat yogurt and Low-Moisture Part-Skim side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Lowfat yogurt is the clear winner. With 257 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Lowfat yogurt contains significantly more sugar (12.35g) compared to the milder Low-Moisture Part-Skim (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Low-Moisture Part-Skim is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Lowfat yogurt or Low-Moisture Part-Skim?
It depends on your goals. Lowfat yogurt has 76 calories, while Low-Moisture Part-Skim has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Lowfat yogurt vegan?
No, Lowfat yogurt is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Lowfat yogurt and Low-Moisture Part-Skim?
There is a difference of 257 calories per 100g between the two products.
