Head-to-Head Analysis

Lucky Charms vs Kalamata Olive

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lucky Charms

Lucky Charms

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kalamata Olive

Kalamata Olive

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
389 kcal
Energy
214 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
3.6g
4.2g
Fat
12.5g
8.3g
Protein
7.1g
1.5g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lucky Charms and Kalamata Olive side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lucky Charms is the more energy-dense option here, packing 175 more calories per 100g than Kalamata Olive. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lucky Charms contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Kalamata Olive (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kalamata Olive is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lucky Charms or Kalamata Olive?

It depends on your goals. Lucky Charms has 389 calories, while Kalamata Olive has 214 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lucky Charms vegan?

No, Lucky Charms is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lucky Charms and Kalamata Olive?

There is a difference of 175 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.