Head-to-Head Analysis

Lucky Charms Treats vs STUTZ PACKING CO.

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Lucky Charms Treats

Lucky Charms Treats

Not Vegan
VS
Package of STUTZ PACKING CO.

STUTZ PACKING CO.

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
360 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
8g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lucky Charms Treats and STUTZ PACKING CO. side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lucky Charms Treats is the clear winner. With 360 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lucky Charms Treats or STUTZ PACKING CO.?

It depends on your goals. Lucky Charms Treats has 0 calories, while STUTZ PACKING CO. has 360 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lucky Charms Treats vegan?

No, Lucky Charms Treats is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lucky Charms Treats and STUTZ PACKING CO.?

There is a difference of 360 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.