Head-to-Head Analysis

Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) vs California Roll Ahi Poke

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)

Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Roll Ahi Poke

California Roll Ahi Poke

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
190 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
0g
6g
Fat
10.6g
16.1g
Protein
14.1g
1.1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) and California Roll Ahi Poke side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) is the clear winner. With 65 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) offers a protein boost with 16.1g per 100g, outperforming California Roll Ahi Poke in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) or California Roll Ahi Poke?

It depends on your goals. Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) has 125 calories, while California Roll Ahi Poke has 190 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) vegan?

No, Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) and California Roll Ahi Poke?

There is a difference of 65 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.