Lunch Kitz vs Social Snackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Lunch Kitz
Social Snackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Lunch Kitz and Social Snackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Lunch Kitz is the clear winner. With 321 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Lunch Kitz contains significantly more sugar (11.4g) compared to the milder Social Snackers (7.1428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Social Snackers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Lunch Kitz or Social Snackers?
It depends on your goals. Lunch Kitz has 179 calories, while Social Snackers has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Lunch Kitz vegan?
No, Lunch Kitz is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Lunch Kitz and Social Snackers?
There is a difference of 321 calories per 100g between the two products.
