Head-to-Head Analysis

Lunch on the run tuna salad vs Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Lunch on the run tuna salad

Lunch on the run tuna salad

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree

Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
199 kcal
Energy
88.5 kcal
11.3g
Sugars
13.3g
11.7g
Fat
0g
3.5g
Protein
1.8g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lunch on the run tuna salad and Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lunch on the run tuna salad is the more energy-dense option here, packing 111 more calories per 100g than Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Lunch on the run tuna salad takes the lead with only 11.26g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree contains 13.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lunch on the run tuna salad or Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree?

It depends on your goals. Lunch on the run tuna salad has 199 calories, while Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree has 88.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lunch on the run tuna salad vegan?

No, Lunch on the run tuna salad is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lunch on the run tuna salad and Organic Peter Rabbit Banana, Mango & Orange Fruit Puree?

There is a difference of 111 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.