Head-to-Head Analysis

Müllermilch Angel Hair Style vs Cinnamon Graham Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Müllermilch Angel Hair Style

Müllermilch Angel Hair Style

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cinnamon Graham Crackers

Cinnamon Graham Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
88 kcal
Energy
1160 kcal
10.2g
Sugars
61.7g
3.6g
Fat
46.3g
3.3g
Protein
15.4g
0.1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Müllermilch Angel Hair Style and Cinnamon Graham Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Müllermilch Angel Hair Style is the clear winner. With 1072 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Müllermilch Angel Hair Style takes the lead with only 10.2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cinnamon Graham Crackers contains 61.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Müllermilch Angel Hair Style or Cinnamon Graham Crackers?

Müllermilch Angel Hair Style appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Müllermilch Angel Hair Style vegan?

No, Müllermilch Angel Hair Style is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Müllermilch Angel Hair Style and Cinnamon Graham Crackers?

There is a difference of 1072 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.