Head-to-Head Analysis

mac & cheese vs Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of mac & cheese

mac & cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli

Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
379 kcal
Energy
91.9 kcal
6.9g
Sugars
1.4g
6g
Fat
1.2g
12.1g
Protein
6.7g
0.3g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing mac & cheese and Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

mac & cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 287 more calories per 100g than Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. mac & cheese contains significantly more sugar (6.9g) compared to the milder Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli (1.41g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? mac & cheese offers a protein boost with 12.1g per 100g, outperforming Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: mac & cheese or Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli?

It depends on your goals. mac & cheese has 379 calories, while Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli has 91.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is mac & cheese vegan?

No, mac & cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between mac & cheese and Classic Alfredo Pasta with Chicken & Broccoli?

There is a difference of 287 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.