Head-to-Head Analysis

Mac & Cheese Original vs Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mac & Cheese Original

Mac & Cheese Original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales

Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
379 kcal
Energy
230 kcal
8.6g
Sugars
2.7g
6g
Fat
9.7g
12.1g
Protein
6.2g
2.1g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mac & Cheese Original and Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mac & Cheese Original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 149 more calories per 100g than Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mac & Cheese Original contains significantly more sugar (8.62g) compared to the milder Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales (2.65g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mac & Cheese Original offers a protein boost with 12.1g per 100g, outperforming Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mac & Cheese Original or Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales?

It depends on your goals. Mac & Cheese Original has 379 calories, while Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales has 230 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mac & Cheese Original vegan?

No, Mac & Cheese Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mac & Cheese Original and Bean Salsa Habanero Walking Tamales?

There is a difference of 149 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.