Head-to-Head Analysis

Mac & Cheese Original vs Traditional german barrel sauerkraut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mac & Cheese Original

Mac & Cheese Original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Traditional german barrel sauerkraut

Traditional german barrel sauerkraut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
34 kcal
6g
Sugars
1.2g
17g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
1.2g
1.4g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mac & Cheese Original and Traditional german barrel sauerkraut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mac & Cheese Original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 366 more calories per 100g than Traditional german barrel sauerkraut. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mac & Cheese Original contains significantly more sugar (6g) compared to the milder Traditional german barrel sauerkraut (1.18g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Traditional german barrel sauerkraut is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mac & Cheese Original offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Traditional german barrel sauerkraut in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mac & Cheese Original or Traditional german barrel sauerkraut?

It depends on your goals. Mac & Cheese Original has 400 calories, while Traditional german barrel sauerkraut has 34 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mac & Cheese Original vegan?

No, Mac & Cheese Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mac & Cheese Original and Traditional german barrel sauerkraut?

There is a difference of 366 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.