Head-to-Head Analysis

Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers vs Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers

Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies

Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
182 kcal
Energy
483.9 kcal
1.5g
Sugars
25.8g
8.1g
Fat
22.6g
7.1g
Protein
3.2g
0.6g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers and Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers is the clear winner. With 302 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers takes the lead with only 1.52g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies contains 25.806451612903g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers offers a protein boost with 7.07g per 100g, outperforming Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers or Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies?

Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers vegan?

No, Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mac & Cheese with Corn & Poblano Peppers and Pumpkin Spice Soft Baked Cookies?

There is a difference of 302 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.