Head-to-Head Analysis

Mackerel vs Candy canes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mackerel

Mackerel

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Candy canes

Candy canes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
357.1 kcal
0.1g
Sugars
64.3g
12.6g
Fat
0g
21.1g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mackerel and Candy canes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mackerel is the clear winner. With 157 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Mackerel takes the lead with only 0.1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Candy canes contains 64.285714285714g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Mackerel offers a protein boost with 21.1g per 100g, outperforming Candy canes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mackerel or Candy canes?

Mackerel appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Mackerel vegan?

No, Mackerel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mackerel and Candy canes?

There is a difference of 157 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.