Head-to-Head Analysis

Mackerel In Brine vs Sour Watermelon Sclices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Mackerel In Brine

Mackerel In Brine

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sour Watermelon Sclices

Sour Watermelon Sclices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
90 kcal
0g
Sugars
14g
10.6g
Fat
0g
23.5g
Protein
1g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mackerel In Brine and Sour Watermelon Sclices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mackerel In Brine is the more energy-dense option here, packing 110 more calories per 100g than Sour Watermelon Sclices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Mackerel In Brine takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour Watermelon Sclices contains 14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Mackerel In Brine offers a protein boost with 23.5g per 100g, outperforming Sour Watermelon Sclices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mackerel In Brine or Sour Watermelon Sclices?

It depends on your goals. Mackerel In Brine has 200 calories, while Sour Watermelon Sclices has 90 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mackerel In Brine vegan?

No, Mackerel In Brine is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mackerel In Brine and Sour Watermelon Sclices?

There is a difference of 110 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.