Macrobar vs Kettle style potato chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Macrobar
Kettle style potato chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Macrobar and Kettle style potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Macrobar is the clear winner. With 85 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Macrobar contains significantly more sugar (10.8g) compared to the milder Kettle style potato chips (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle style potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Macrobar offers a protein boost with 16.9g per 100g, outperforming Kettle style potato chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Macrobar or Kettle style potato chips?
It depends on your goals. Macrobar has 415 calories, while Kettle style potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Macrobar vegan?
No, Macrobar is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Macrobar and Kettle style potato chips?
There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.
