Head-to-Head Analysis

MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip vs Gingersnaps Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip

MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Gingersnaps Original

Gingersnaps Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1600 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
64g
Sugars
33.3g
48g
Fat
16.7g
80g
Protein
3.3g
1g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip and Gingersnaps Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1133 more calories per 100g than Gingersnaps Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip contains significantly more sugar (64g) compared to the milder Gingersnaps Original (33.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Gingersnaps Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip offers a protein boost with 80g per 100g, outperforming Gingersnaps Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip or Gingersnaps Original?

It depends on your goals. MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip has 1600 calories, while Gingersnaps Original has 467 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip vegan?

No, MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between MACROBAR mini oatmeal chocolate chip and Gingersnaps Original?

There is a difference of 1133 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.