MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips vs Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips

Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips and Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips takes the lead with only 12.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs contains 47.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips offers a protein boost with 15.4g per 100g, outperforming Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips or Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs?
It depends on your goals. MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips has 415 calories, while Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs has 215 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips vegan?
No, MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between MACROBAR timeless treasure salted caramel + chocolate chips and Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs?
There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.




