Head-to-Head Analysis

Madeleines Chocolate Marble vs California Ripe Sliced Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Madeleines Chocolate Marble

Madeleines Chocolate Marble

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Ripe Sliced Olives

California Ripe Sliced Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
440 kcal
Energy
125 kcal
24g
Sugars
0g
24g
Fat
6.3g
4g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Madeleines Chocolate Marble and California Ripe Sliced Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Madeleines Chocolate Marble is the more energy-dense option here, packing 315 more calories per 100g than California Ripe Sliced Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Madeleines Chocolate Marble contains significantly more sugar (24g) compared to the milder California Ripe Sliced Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, California Ripe Sliced Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Madeleines Chocolate Marble offers a protein boost with 4g per 100g, outperforming California Ripe Sliced Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Madeleines Chocolate Marble or California Ripe Sliced Olives?

It depends on your goals. Madeleines Chocolate Marble has 440 calories, while California Ripe Sliced Olives has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Madeleines Chocolate Marble vegan?

No, Madeleines Chocolate Marble is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Madeleines Chocolate Marble and California Ripe Sliced Olives?

There is a difference of 315 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.