Head-to-Head Analysis

Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g vs Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g

Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade

Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
136 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
7.3g
Sugars
0g
1.6g
Fat
43.3g
6.1g
Protein
0g
14g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g and Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g is the clear winner. With 264 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g contains significantly more sugar (7.3g) compared to the milder Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g offers a protein boost with 6.1g per 100g, outperforming Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g or Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade?

It depends on your goals. Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g has 136 calories, while Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g vegan?

No, Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mae ploy Red curry paste 400g and Green Goddess Dressing & Marinade?

There is a difference of 264 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.