Head-to-Head Analysis

makhane vs Tom’s Nacho Rings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of makhane

makhane

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Tom’s Nacho Rings

Tom’s Nacho Rings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
346 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
0.6g
Sugars
3.6g
0.2g
Fat
46.4g
9.9g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing makhane and Tom’s Nacho Rings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, makhane is the clear winner. With 225 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, makhane takes the lead with only 0.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Tom’s Nacho Rings contains 3.5714285714286g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? makhane offers a protein boost with 9.9g per 100g, outperforming Tom’s Nacho Rings in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: makhane or Tom’s Nacho Rings?

makhane appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is makhane vegan?

No, makhane is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between makhane and Tom’s Nacho Rings?

There is a difference of 225 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.