Head-to-Head Analysis

Malaga vs 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Malaga

Malaga

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate

92% Cacao Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
466 kcal
Energy
558.8 kcal
57g
Sugars
5.9g
22g
Fat
58.8g
3.2g
Protein
8.8g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Malaga and 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Malaga is the clear winner. With 93 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Malaga contains significantly more sugar (57g) compared to the milder 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate (5.88235294117647g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Malaga or 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Malaga has 466 calories, while 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate has 558.823529411765 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Malaga vegan?

No, Malaga is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Malaga and 92% Cacao Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.