Malt Lunchbox Loaves vs Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Malt Lunchbox Loaves
Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Malt Lunchbox Loaves and Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Malt Lunchbox Loaves is the clear winner. With 118 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Malt Lunchbox Loaves takes the lead with only 19g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip contains 22.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Malt Lunchbox Loaves or Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip?
Malt Lunchbox Loaves appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Malt Lunchbox Loaves vegan?
No, Malt Lunchbox Loaves is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Malt Lunchbox Loaves and Kellog's NutriGrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Chocolate Chip?
There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.
