Head-to-Head Analysis

Mamba vs Dark Russet potatoes chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mamba

Mamba

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark Russet potatoes chips

Dark Russet potatoes chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
415 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
64.2g
Sugars
0g
5.7g
Fat
28.6g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mamba and Dark Russet potatoes chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Mamba is the clear winner. With 121 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mamba contains significantly more sugar (64.2g) compared to the milder Dark Russet potatoes chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark Russet potatoes chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mamba or Dark Russet potatoes chips?

It depends on your goals. Mamba has 415 calories, while Dark Russet potatoes chips has 535.71 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mamba vegan?

No, Mamba is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mamba and Dark Russet potatoes chips?

There is a difference of 121 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.