Head-to-Head Analysis

Mango Hatch Chile Sausage vs Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Mango Hatch Chile Sausage

Mango Hatch Chile Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
341 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
0g
25.9g
Fat
0g
15.3g
Protein
0g
1.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Mango Hatch Chile Sausage and Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Mango Hatch Chile Sausage is the more energy-dense option here, packing 341 more calories per 100g than Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Mango Hatch Chile Sausage contains significantly more sugar (7.06g) compared to the milder Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Mango Hatch Chile Sausage offers a protein boost with 15.3g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Mango Hatch Chile Sausage or Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Mango Hatch Chile Sausage has 341 calories, while Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Mango Hatch Chile Sausage vegan?

No, Mango Hatch Chile Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Mango Hatch Chile Sausage and Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 341 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.