Mantia’s Jumbo Shells vs UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Mantia’s Jumbo Shells
UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Mantia’s Jumbo Shells and UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Mantia’s Jumbo Shells is the more energy-dense option here, packing 362 more calories per 100g than UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Mantia’s Jumbo Shells contains significantly more sugar (3.64g) compared to the milder UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Mantia’s Jumbo Shells offers a protein boost with 14.5g per 100g, outperforming UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Mantia’s Jumbo Shells or UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM?
It depends on your goals. Mantia’s Jumbo Shells has 364 calories, while UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM has 2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Mantia’s Jumbo Shells vegan?
No, Mantia’s Jumbo Shells is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Mantia’s Jumbo Shells and UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM?
There is a difference of 362 calories per 100g between the two products.
