Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple almond crunch cereal vs Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Maple almond crunch cereal

Maple almond crunch cereal

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack

Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
421 kcal
Energy
160 kcal
7.9g
Sugars
13g
18.4g
Fat
9g
26.3g
Protein
3g
1.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple almond crunch cereal and Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple almond crunch cereal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 261 more calories per 100g than Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Maple almond crunch cereal takes the lead with only 7.89g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack contains 13g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Maple almond crunch cereal offers a protein boost with 26.3g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple almond crunch cereal or Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack?

It depends on your goals. Maple almond crunch cereal has 421 calories, while Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack has 160 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple almond crunch cereal vegan?

No, Maple almond crunch cereal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple almond crunch cereal and Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack?

There is a difference of 261 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.