Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky vs Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky

Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers

Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
438 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
0g
5.4g
Fat
9.4g
35.7g
Protein
6.3g
2.7g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky and Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky is the clear winner. With 117 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 35.7g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky or Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky has 321 calories, while Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers has 438 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky vegan?

No, Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple & Brown Sugar Beef Jerky and Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers?

There is a difference of 117 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.