Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars vs Bengal Spice Herbal Tea

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars

Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bengal Spice Herbal Tea

Bengal Spice Herbal Tea

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
452.4 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars and Bengal Spice Herbal Tea side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars is the more energy-dense option here, packing 452 more calories per 100g than Bengal Spice Herbal Tea. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars contains significantly more sugar (28.571428571429g) compared to the milder Bengal Spice Herbal Tea (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bengal Spice Herbal Tea is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Bengal Spice Herbal Tea in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars or Bengal Spice Herbal Tea?

It depends on your goals. Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars has 452.38095238095 calories, while Bengal Spice Herbal Tea has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars vegan?

No, Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple Brown Sugar Granola Bars and Bengal Spice Herbal Tea?

There is a difference of 452 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.