Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal vs Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal

Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola

Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
372 kcal
Energy
509.1 kcal
30.2g
Sugars
18.2g
4.7g
Fat
23.6g
9.3g
Protein
9.1g
1.4g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal and Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal is the clear winner. With 137 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal contains significantly more sugar (30.23g) compared to the milder Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola (18.181818181818g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal or Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola?

It depends on your goals. Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal has 372 calories, while Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola has 509.09090909091 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal vegan?

No, Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Irish Oatmeal and Coconut & Cashew Butter Granola?

There is a difference of 137 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.