Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal vs Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal

Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch

Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
372.1 kcal
Energy
340.9 kcal
30.2g
Sugars
9.1g
4.7g
Fat
11.4g
9.3g
Protein
22.7g
1.5g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal and Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 31 more calories per 100g than Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal contains significantly more sugar (30.23g) compared to the milder Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch (9.09090909090909g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal or Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch?

It depends on your goals. Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal has 372.09 calories, while Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch has 340.909090909091 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal vegan?

No, Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal and Caramel Double Chocolate Crunch?

There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.