Head-to-Head Analysis

Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats vs Kinloch Pecan Oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats

Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kinloch Pecan Oil

Kinloch Pecan Oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
383 kcal
Energy
866.7 kcal
17g
Sugars
0g
5.3g
Fat
93.3g
21.3g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats and Kinloch Pecan Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats is the clear winner. With 484 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats contains significantly more sugar (17g) compared to the milder Kinloch Pecan Oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kinloch Pecan Oil is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats offers a protein boost with 21.3g per 100g, outperforming Kinloch Pecan Oil in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats or Kinloch Pecan Oil?

It depends on your goals. Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats has 383 calories, while Kinloch Pecan Oil has 866.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats vegan?

No, Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Maple Cinnamon Roll Protein Instant Oats and Kinloch Pecan Oil?

There is a difference of 484 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.